Description: This publication examines how expert clinicians interpret continuous glucose monitor (CGM) data from individuals without diabetes. By comparing expert recommendations for follow-up care based on CGM reports, HbA1c, and fasting glucose, it highlights substantial disagreement among clinicians and underscores the lack of established guidelines and normative CGM criteria for this population.

Citation: Spartano, N. L., Prescott, B., Walker, M. E., Shi, E., Venkatesan, G., Fei, D., Lin, H., Murabito, J. M., Ahn, D., Battelino, T., Edelman, S. V., Fleming, G. A., Freckmann, G., Galindo, R. J., Joubert, M., Lansang, M. C., Mader, J. K., Mankovsky, B., Mathioudakis, N. N., Mohan, V., … Steenkamp, D. W. (2025). Expert Clinical Interpretation of Continuous Glucose Monitor Reports From Individuals Without Diabetes. Journal of diabetes science and technology, 19322968251315171. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968251315171

Copyright: © 2025 Diabetes Technology Society